Articles 2021

Today
Today

What’s Old is New Again – Interest Rate Decision in Ontario

  • October 18, 2018
  • Jonathan Fleisher and Amanda Scolieri

A case summary exploring the Ontario Court of Appeal's position on Section 4 of the Interest Act, specifically pertaining to interest payable by borrowers, in its recently released decision Solar Power Network Inc. v. ClearFlow Energy.

Business Law, Student Forum

How to Print Without Shame

  • October 18, 2018
  • Pulat Yunusov

There is still room for printing in today's paperless office (and it's not just for paper-only audiences like courts).

Law Practice Management, Student Forum

New and Exciting Opportunities – and Claims Risks: Marijuana Law

  • October 18, 2018
  • Ian Hu, counsel, claims prevention & practicePRO, LAWPRO

Changes to marijuana laws present lawyers with new opportunities, but their best practices remain the same: don't dabble, comply with the rules of professional conduct, investigate sufficiently, and protect clients' confidentiality.

Law Practice Management, Student Forum

Blaney's Appeals: Ontario Court of Appeal Summaries (October 8 – 12, 2018)

  • October 15, 2018
  • John Polyzogopoulos

Following are the summaries for this week’s civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. In Shah v LG Chem Ltd, the Court of Appeal certified a class action for claims of conspiracy at common law and conspiracy to price fix under the Competition Act, in relation to lithium-ion batteries. The Court determined that the concept of “indeterminate liability” in negligence law should not be imported into the analysis of common conspiracy or Competition Act claims.

Aboriginal Law, Civil Litigation, Student Forum

A Case Comment: Janicek v Janicek

  • October 12, 2018
  • Melissa Grover, Arkin Estate Law

An analysis of the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Janicek v. Janicek, 2018 ONCA 679, with respect to the interpretation of terms of a Will pertaining to the division and sale of a family farm.

Student Forum, Trusts and Estates Law

Girouard v CJC: An Administrative State Coup?

  • October 10, 2018
  • Mark Mancini

Commenting on Girouard v Canada (AG), 2018 FC 865, the author argues this case is an example of a trend towards more administrative decision-makers that have unlimited powers. This trend has profound implications for the Rule of Law, as it places such decision-makers alongside the Constitution as beyond reproach. But the administrative state is not a constitutional mandate. The Canadian Judicial Council is vested with powers by its enabling statute. It does not have inherent power.

Administrative Law, Student Forum

Automatic Features in DC Pension Plans

  • October 10, 2018
  • Brian Sweigman, Willis Towers Watson

Can automatic features in DC pension plans close the retirement savings gap? In response to the disappointing level of employee participation in retirement savings plans, auto features in plans have gained increasing popularity in the United States, but the approach has not yet caught on as broadly in Canada.

Pensions and Benefits Law, Student Forum