Articles 2020

Today
Today

Evidentiary Requirements for Prescriptive Easements

  • October 30, 2018
  • Raymond H. Mikkola, Pallet Valo LLP

In a recent decision, the Court of Appeal sheds light on the evidentiary requirements to make a claim of a prescriptive easement against an owner of a “Land Titles Conversion Qualified” property.

Real Property Law, Student Forum

Title Insurance Companies Answer Questions

  • October 30, 2018
  • Georgea S. Wolfe, Goldman, Sloan, Nash and Haber LLP

Title insurance is a fairly standard aspect of real estate transactions, and particularly so for residential real estate transactions involving mortgages. The author set out to have the major title insurance companies answer some questions about their policies.

Real Property Law, Student Forum

The Return of Roncarelli: The Tesla Decision and the Rule of Law

  • October 29, 2018
  • By Rachel Weiner, staff lawyer, IAVGO Community Legal Clinic

Within his first few months in office, Ontario’s new Premier, Doug Ford, has prompted a carefully worded but vehement defence of the rule of law in Tesla v Ontario (Ministry of Transportation), 2018 ONSC 5062. Justice Myers reviewed the discretionary exclusion of Tesla from the transitional program for car subsidies, determining it was unrelated to any statutory purpose and did not afford any procedural fairness. Justice Myers quashed the decision and remitted it back to the Minister.

Administrative Law, Student Forum

Brown Bag Lunch – October 16, 2018

  • October 29, 2018
  • Noah Weisberg and Chris Cieslik, Hull & Hull LLP

Highlights from the October 16, 2018 Brown Bag Lunch including a discussion about the effect of the Re Milne decision for estate solicitors, the rule of convenience in Rivard v. Morris, conflict of laws surrounding marriage and wills, cross-border payments to beneficiaries and digital asset clauses in Wills.

Student Forum, Trusts and Estates Law

Diminished Ability to Communicate? Or, Diminished Decisional Capacity?

  • October 25, 2018
  • Kimberly A. Whaley, Whaley Estate Litigation Partners

Mills v Radons, 2018 SKQB 237 (CanLII), a recent case from Saskatchewan, looks at whether a husband had the requisite decisional capacity to instruct his counsel in divorce proceedings and whether his intention was to seek a divorce and spousal support.

Elder Law, Student Forum

Why You Should Avoid Acting for Family and Friends

  • October 24, 2018
  • Ian Hu, counsel, claims prevention & practicePRO (LawPRO)

An eye-opening example followed by a round-up of reasons not to act for family and friends. The one about malpractice insurance is especially jarring.

Law Practice Management, Student Forum