Articles

Until recently, it was well-accepted at common law that employers had no right to lay off an employee, absent an agreement to the contrary. However, following 2013 Ontario case of Trites v. Renin Corp., this long-standing principle has come up for debate.

The recent SCC decision in Bernard involves a situation where a trade union sought home contact information for bargaining unit members from an employer. The PSLRB ordered the employer to provide the home contact information of bargaining unit members to the union because the information was necessary for the union to carry out its representational duties. The union was also ordered to keep the information secure and only use the information for representational purposes.

The Supreme Court of Canada has expanded the ability of Ontario litigants to obtain a final judgment without the need for a full trial. On January 23, 2014, the Court released its’ decisions in Hryniak v. Mauldin and Bruno Appliance and Furniture Inc. v. Hyrniak, unanimously endorsing an expanded use of summary judgment under Rule 20 of Ontario’s Rules of Civil Procedure.

The Stronger Workplaces for a Stronger Economy Act, 2013 (Bill 146) was introduced in Parliament on December 4, 2013. If enacted, Bill 146 will have significant implications for Ontario employers as a direct result of amendments that it will make to Ontario employment legislation.

On November 11, 2013, SOGIC hosted its Fall program event, “Gender Identity and Gender Expression in the Workplace”. The purpose was to raise awareness about what is now required of employers under the Human Rights Code’s new prohibited grounds of “gender identity” and “gender expression”.

Contained in nearly every settlement agreement between employers and employees is a confidentiality provision. These obligations should be understood and taken seriously, as there is a recent trend of cases in Ontario which have imposed serious consequences for those in breach of such provisions.