Articles

About ArticlesLes articles ci-dessous sont publiés par la Section du droit du travail et de l'emploi de l'Association du Barreau de l'Ontario. Les membres sont invités à soumettre des articles.  A propos des articles.

Rédacteur : Andrew Reynolds

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui
When a Punch is Not Enough for Just Cause Dismissal

When a Punch is Not Enough for Just Cause Dismissal

  • 22 avril 2015
  • Parisa Nikfarjam

A recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice proves how challenging just cause dismissals can be for employers. In this case, the Court found that an employee who punched a co-worker in the nose did not deserve the “capital punishment” in employment law – dismissal for cause.

Droit du travail et de l’emploi
“Stay Home… But We’ll Pay You”: Do Employers Have a Duty to Provide Work?

“Stay Home… But We’ll Pay You”: Do Employers Have a Duty to Provide Work?

  • 26 mars 2015
  • Daniel Chodos

Is “work” distinguishable from “employment”? The SCC recently answered in the affirmative – at least for one executive director. Stressing the duty of good faith and fair dealing, the Court held that a suspension with pay amounted to a constructive dismissal –sending shivers through every employer who levies an administrative suspension.

Droit du travail et de l’emploi
Government of Ontario Unveils Workplace Harassment and Workplace Violence Action Plan

Government of Ontario Unveils Workplace Harassment and Workplace Violence Action Plan

  • 26 mars 2015
  • Bethan Dinning

Premier Wynne's action plan to combat sexual violence and harassment entitled It’s Never Okay: An Action Plan to Stop Sexual Violence and Harassment was released this month. Employers should be ready to review their workplace harassment policies and procedures in light of any new legislation proposed and take advantage of any new guidance provided by the Province.

Droit du travail et de l’emploi
Harassment Policies and Programs

Harassment Policies and Programs

  • 23 mars 2015
  • Sarah Vokey

With Bill 168 came increased obligations on employers to provide a workplace that is free from harassment and violence. In practice, we find that a key tool for employers in effectively dealing with harassment and bullying in the workplace are policies and programs. This article discusses some suggestions for creating useful policies and programs.

Droit du travail et de l’emploi
Keeping the Good Faith: The Supreme Court Clarifies Constructive Dismissal and Emphasizes Honesty, Candidness and Communication

Keeping the Good Faith: The Supreme Court Clarifies Constructive Dismissal and Emphasizes Honesty, Candidness and Communication

  • 23 mars 2015
  • Sharaf Sultan

The Supreme Court of Canada has just ruled on constructive dismissal, good faith dealings and administrative suspensions. The case is an important review of the law surrounding the expectations for employers in managing employees and processes to be followed in taking unilateral action including through the implementation of an administrative suspension.

Droit du travail et de l’emploi
Tie-Breaker FCA Decision: The Canada Labour Code Permits Without Cause Terminations of Non-Unionized Employees

Tie-Breaker FCA Decision: The Canada Labour Code Permits Without Cause Terminations of Non-Unionized Employees

  • 19 février 2015
  • Jodi Gallagher Healy

In the recent of Wilson v. Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the Canada Labour Code permits without cause terminations. In other words, without cause terminations are not automatically unjust dismissals under the Code. An adjudicator must examine the circumstances of the particular case to see whether the dismissal is “unjust.”

Guidance from the Court of Appeal on Working with Expert Witnesses

Guidance from the Court of Appeal on Working with Expert Witnesses

  • 19 février 2015
  • Brian Wasyliw

Concern about the impartiality of expert evidence seized the spotlight when a trial decision issued last year in Moore v. Getahun criticized legal counsel for getting too involved in the preparation of an expert’s written report. The decision sent shockwaves through the legal community and among those who provide expert testimony. Fortunately, the Court of Appeal for Ontario has restored relative calm in a recent decision.