Articles 2020

Aujourdʼhui
Aujourdʼhui

Blaney's Appeals: Ontario Court of Appeal Summaries (October 15 – 19, 2018)

  • 22 octobre 2018
  • John Polyzogopoulos

Following are the summaries for this week’s civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario. All the decisions this week were procedural in nature. One of those was yet another decision in Fontaine v Canada, the Residential School Settlement case, with more appellate decisions apparently to come in that matter.

Litige civil, Student Forum

Misnomers and Misdescriptions: The "Litigation Finger Test" to the Rescue!

  • 22 octobre 2018
  • Marie-Andrée Vermette, WeirFoulds LLP,

Plaintiffs' counsel be aware: the litigation finger test can assist in cases of misdescription or misnomer of a party, allowing the plaintiff to correct their mistake and "add" the intended person as a party even after the expiration of the limitation period.

Litige civil, Student Forum

Privacy Commissioner Says Public Profiles Are Private

  • 22 octobre 2018
  • Imran Ahmad, Katherine Barbacki, and Alexia Magneron

Report from the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada sheds light on the limits that Canadian privacy regulators can impose on the use of publicly available personal information on social networking platforms.

Droit de la protection de la vie privée, Student Forum

When a Tribunal’s Reasons Won’t Fly: SCC in Lukács addresses supplemental reasons and public interest standing

  • 22 octobre 2018
  • Ryan MacIsaac

In Delta Airlines Inc v Lukács, the Supreme Court addresses two important issues. First, in a counter-intuitive way, it addresses when a reviewing court may supplement reasons, following concerns raised by administrative lawyers after the seminal case of Edmonton East. Second, it reaffirms that tribunals and courts should provide access to justice by maintaining an open door to public interest litigants with genuine complaints.

Droit administratif, Student Forum

Stirrett v Cheema et al: Ontario Court Explores Fiduciary Duty in Research-Participant Relationship

  • 22 octobre 2018
  • Nida Sohani

A recent decision from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice examines when a researcher-participant relationship in the context of human studies will give rise to fiduciary obligations. In Stirrett v Cheema et al, 2018 ONSC 2595, a plaintiff successfully recovered damages from a defendant physician on the basis that the doctor breached his fiduciary duty to the plaintiff’s deceased spouse who was a participant in the doctor’s study.

Droit relatif à la santé, Student Forum

BC Supreme Court Rectifies Excessive Capital Dividend Election

  • 18 octobre 2018
  • Seth Lim, PwC Law LLP

The courts continue to delineate the scope and operation of rectification following the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Canada (Attorney General) v. Fairmont Hotels Inc., which significantly curtailed the availability of the remedy. This article discusses a recent British Columbia Supreme Court decision in which the Court granted an order to rectify a directors’ resolution declaring a capital dividend, the amount of which had been erroneously inflated.

Student Forum, Droit fiscal

What’s Old is New Again – Interest Rate Decision in Ontario

  • 18 octobre 2018
  • Jonathan Fleisher and Amanda Scolieri

A case summary exploring the Ontario Court of Appeal's position on Section 4 of the Interest Act, specifically pertaining to interest payable by borrowers, in its recently released decision Solar Power Network Inc. v. ClearFlow Energy.

Droit des affaires, Student Forum