Ressources

A lively discussion about what changes may come following the decision, what questions remain unanswered, and implications for the division of powers.

In the last couple of years the federal government has introduced a number of legislative changes that affect Aboriginal communities. Get yourself up to date with this timely program: learn more about these changes.

Whether you are working in the area of criminal law, Aboriginal law, constitutional law, or the public sector, do not miss this opportunity to join this important discussion of the scope of an accused's right under ss.11(d) and (f) of the Charter, to representativeness of the jury roll, and what the province must do to ensure that right is not violated.

The duty of the federal and provincial Crown to consult with Aboriginal peoples is well-established in law; the application of this duty in the administrative law context is less clearly developed.

The Supreme Court of Canada has recently delivered two decisions - Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia (a.k.a. Roger William) and Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources) (a.k.a. Keewatin) - which will drive the law and politics of Aboriginal title and treaty rights for years to come.

Aboriginal property issues can impact real estate transactions in many different ways. If off-reserve treaty issues were to arise unexpectedly in your next deal, are you confident you would be able to advise your client adequately?

Hear directly from Deputy Grand Chief Les Louttit, the Honourable Bob Rae, Christine Kaszycki and Joseph Gaboury on the challenges and opportunities created by the Ring of Fire.

The Aboriginal Law section is pleased to welcome The Honourable David Zimmer, Minister of Aboriginal Affairs to the Ontario Bar Association.

The Report of the Honourable Frank Iacobucci into First Nations representation on Ontario juries considers and provides immediate practical suggestions to increase representation.

In the recent landmark decision of Daniels v. Canada, the Federal Court ended twelve years of litigation, holding that Métis and non-status Aboriginal peoples are “Indians” for purposes of s. 91(24) of the Constitution Act, 1867.