Scope of production and discovery

Phasellus ullamcorper massa lectus, ut finibus augue lobortis non. Proin efficitur at lorem et porta. In volutpat lacus vel magna efficitur, nec finibus erat elementum.

Apotex inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2007 FCA 379 (CanLII)

  • November 29, 2011

Date: 2007-11-29 Docket: A-25-07; A-22-07. Sharlow J.A
[30] In determining the propriety of a particular question posed in the examination for discovery of Dr. Ryan, the test is whether it is reasonable to conclude that the answer to that question might lead Apotex to a train of enquiry that may either advance its case or damage the case of BMS: Apotex v. Canada, 2005 FCA 217 (CanLII), 2005 FCA 217.

Rule 30 Discovery of Documents

  • May 26, 2015

NOT SURE OF THE DATE FOR THIS? 30.01 (1) (a) of the Ontario Rules of Civil Procedure, Courts of Justice Act, R.R.O. 1990, Regulation 194, interprets "document" to include: "a sound recording, videotape, film, photograph, chart, graph, map, plan, survey, book of account, and data and information in electronic form".