Date: 2011-11-23 Donald Lee J. | Link

Claim alleges that former employee Beck logged into Bavaria Autohaus' system to export private and confidential information about Bavaria's customers, potential customers, sales data and deals. Bavaria sought an ex parte injunction and an Anton Piller order. At para 22 the Court acknowledges some deficiencies in the application for the Anton Piller, but grants it nevertheless given the need to protect private customer data.

Date: 2007-11-21 Docket: 06-CL-6574 Pepall J. | Link
Unsuccessful motion to set aside an Anton Piller order. Defendant raised ten bases, each of which were rejected. Note that defendant had initially refused entry, but agreed later in the day after being served with a contempt motion. Two of the computers that had been subject to the search were found not to contain any hard drives.

Date: 2006-05-31 Docket: 0403 17495;0403 17494. Chief Justice A.H. Wachowich. | Link

Where documents obtained under an Anton Piller order can be used in other actions.

Date: 2007-10-03 Docket: S/C/549/07 Peter S. Glennie J. | Link
Reasons for granting an application for an injunction against the use of proprietary and confidential information and an Anton Piller order. Nice review of the law up to October 2007 on Anton Piller orders.

Date: 2007-06-21 Docket: 0703-0027-AC. Côté J.A. | Link

Successful appeal of an Anton Piller order. Reviews the four essential conditions for granting an Anton Piller order as described in Celanese. (para 7) The original request failed to demonstrate deliberate dishonest conduct. (para 35).

Date: 2006-07-27 Docket: 30652. Coram: McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps, Fish and Charron JJ. | Link

Headnotes from Supreme Court of Canada: "Civil procedure - Anton Piller order - Requirements for order - Guidelines for preparation and execution of order." (head notes) Defines the fundamental purpose of an Anton Piller order as "the preservation of relevant evidence". (para 31)

Date: 2006-04-06 Docket: 05-CL-5716. J.M. Farley J. | Link

"If there are aspects of that index (which would be a public document in a report – upon an equivalent AP [Anton Pillar] (SIC) order execution which this process is to mirror) which contain truly irrelevant material to the dispute – and which the defendants for personal reasons would prefer not to be on the public record, then a motion could be brought to have the full index sealed and an expurgated one provided for the public record which contains information which is clearly not irrelevant. In that regard reference may be had to Knight v. KPMG LLP, (1999), 20 C.B.R. (4th) 258. If the parties were able to agree as to irrelevant aspects, this may well be of significance to the hearing judge. "

Date: 2008-01-15 Docket: 0603 02889 ; 0601 05676  Frans F. Slatter JCQBA. | Link
Application to set aside an Anton Piller order. Defendant was working as an IT consultant developing applications for the Alberta Treasury Branches and was dismissed after a dispute.

Date: 2010-02-23 Docket: 09-8091-00CL Cumming J. | Link

Findings of contempt resulting from the defendant's hiding of disk drives, deletion of information and general lack of cooperation in the execution of two Anton Piller Orders.

Date: 2006-05-12 Docket: T-1779-05. J. Gauthier J. | Link
"The plaintiffs now ask the Court to review the matter and to confirm that the Anton Piller Order was properly granted and that it was executed in accordance with its terms against the defendants Alain Elmaleh (Elmaleh), 144942 Canada Inc. (cob Kaytel Video Distribution) (Kaytel) and Leisure Time Canada Inc. (Leisure Time).