Discovery Plan

NEW - Palmerston Grain, A Partnership et al. v. Royal Bank of Canada, 2014 ONSC 5134 (CanLII)

  • September 05, 2014

Date: 2014-09-05 Mitchell J. | Link
Citing Harris v. ATC Aviation Technical Consultants, 2014 CarswellOnt 4709 (Ont. S.C.J.), the Court found that “[p]arties are required to comply with the Sedona Principles and failing to do so is a breach of the rules”. The parties were unable to agree on an e-discovery plan, thus the court provided direction and guidance having regard to the Sedona Principles.

Cameco Corporation v. The Queen, 2010 TCC 636

  • January 12, 2011

Date: 2011-01-12 Docket: 2009-2430(IT)G. Rip C.J. | Link
Transfer pricing case. At para 55, the Chief Justice invokes Ontario's Rule 29.1 - "In order to avoid delaying further this appeal any longer and in an attempt to demarcate the scope of the discovery with respect to these paragraphs I will order the parties to prepare and file a plan of discovery for matters related to paragraphs 16, 17, 18, 19 and 28 of the reply at least 30 days before the date agreed to for discovery[15].

Canplas v. McKee, 2012 ONSC 1416

  • February 28, 2012

Date: 2012-02-28 Master Abrams. | Link
The defendants seeks an order to protect the confidentiality and secrecy of certain information, similar to that in their litigation in Federal Court.

Kariouk v. Pombo, 2012 ONSC 939

  • February 14, 2012

Date: 2012-02-14 Master MacLeod. | Link
The plaintiff was hired to design and plan the renovation of a historic home which the defendants had purchased in Ottawa.

Mansfield v. Ottawa, 2012 ONSC 5208
  • September 17, 2012

Date: 2012-09-17 Master MacLeod | Link
Master MacLeod denied costs because of the lack of a discovery plan – and disproportionate motion activity - in this personal injury case.