Today
Today

Accessing “Mixed” Youth Court Records

  • September 21, 2016
  • Brock Jones

Access to the court records of children and young persons who interact with the criminal or civil justice systems is tightly controlled. For example, youth records created for the purposes of a criminal investigation or prosecution are protected by a strict and comprehensive set of provisions found in Part VI of the Youth Criminal Justice Act.

Child and Youth Law

Pension Regulation - What's New

  • September 21, 2016
  • Michelle Rival and Evan Shapiro of Willis Towers Watson Canada

New draft regulations on Pension Advisory Committees; new FSCO FAQs on the interest rates and mortality tables to be used in Family Law Value calculations, SIPPs, and the annual/biennial statements for members, former members and retired members; proposed amendments to the Employment Standards Act; and new case law regarding access to pension plan financial records.

Pensions and Benefits Law

Executive Social Recap: Paint Nite!

  • September 21, 2016
  • Jill Lewis

On September 7, 2016, the OBA Young Lawyer’s Division (East) attended Paint Nite at The Three Brewers on 240 Sparks Street in Ottawa for our first social night of the year.

Group Privacy

Group Privacy

  • September 21, 2016
  • Alan D. Gold

Technology is changing the way we communicate - and with how many we communicate at any given time. Group emails and a myriad of other communication methods raise the question: can groups of people enjoy the traditional protections bestowed on "private" communication?

Criminal Justice
September 2016 Appeal Court Review

September 2016 Appeal Court Review

  • September 20, 2016
  • Crystal Tomusiak

Highlights from the Ontario Court of Appeal: Crown misconduct, searching "abandoned" cars, and hearsay evidence both spoken and heard by the dead.

Criminal Justice
Text Messages and Privacy: Waiting for the Last Word from the Supreme Court

Text Messages and Privacy: Waiting for the Last Word from the Supreme Court

  • September 19, 2016
  • Alan D. Gold

In R. v. Marakah, 2016 ONCA 542, the Court of Appeal for Ontario ruled 2:1 that an accused has no reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of his own sent text messages found in another person's phone. H.S. Laforme J.A. dissented with power and eloquence. We await further direction from the Supreme Court.

Criminal Justice

Richmond Hill and Parkland Dedication: Is the Municipality Entitled to Deference on the Alternate Requirement?

  • September 19, 2016
  • Marc Kemerer

A review of the Divisional Court’s recent decision dealing with the power of a municipality to establish an alternative rate for parkland dedication in its official plan and the question of whether the Ontario Municipal Board has the authority to impose an overall cap on the alternative requirement as part of the Board’s approval of the official plan.

Municipal Law