Articles 2021

The new trust reporting rules, enacted in December 2022, are now in effect, for taxation years ending after December 30, 2023. The new rules will require a greater number of trusts to file both a T3 Trust Income Tax and Information Return and a new Schedule 15. Trustees of a wide variety of trusts, including bare trusts and non-resident trusts, now have the additional onus of determining which trusts (that were previously exempt from filing a T3 Return) are captured by the new rules.

In 3295940 (2024 FCA 42; rev’g 2022 TCC 68) (“3295”), the FCA provides welcome guidance on the court’s application of the General Anti-Avoidance Rule (the “GAAR”) in section 245 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”). 3295 is one of the few GAAR cases that has been decided in favour of the taxpayer after a long string of decisions following the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Deans Knight (2023 SCC 16).

Special rules of disposition apply for involuntary dispositions such as expropriations. These rules can lead to a deferral of the recognition of capital gains pending a final resolution of the compensation amount. The expropriated party may wish to consider the value of the potential deferral versus crystallizing capital gains in advance of the proposed increase of the capital gains inclusion rate from one-half (1/2) to two-thirds (2/3) on June 25.

In Glencore Canada Corporation v. The Queen (2024 FCA 3), the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal on whether fees related to a failed bid were received on income or capital account. The FCA held that the fees were included in income as an inducement payment pursuant to paragraph 12(1)(x).

In Madison Pacific Properties Inc. v The King, the Tax Court of Canada found that the GAAR applied to deny the appellant’s deduction of net capital losses, citing the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Deans Knight for the first time in a loss-trading case. Two companies had acted in concert to fundamentally transform the appellant and use non-voting shares to access its losses without acquiring de jure control of the appellant contrary to the object, spirit, and purpose of subsection 111(4).

This article explores the uncertain income tax consequences facing Canadian taxpayers involved in the lending and borrowing of crypto assets on Decentralized Finance (DeFi) lending protocols. CRA's guidance is urged to be upholstered and increased to mitigate against the risk that taxpayers will incorrectly report and file crypto-asset transactions.

The Tax Court of Canada’s decision in Gaudreau c. Le Roi, 2023 CCI 115 (currently under appeal to the FCA), addresses whether a taxpayer may be compelled to produce an accounting firm’s memo in the context of the taxpayer’s examination for discovery. The taxpayer resisted disclosure on the basis that the accounting firm’s memo was not relevant to the CRA’s assessing position. The Tax Court nevertheless concluded that there is no accountant-client privilege and that the memo should be disclosed.

In this brief article, Neti Jhatakia provides an overview of the income tax implications of the staking of cryptocurrency in Canada.

In June, the National Post publicized a tax appeal by Toronto sports icon José Bautista. Because the appeal deals with how non-resident, high-income earners save for retirement and protect their income from Canadian taxes, commentators have speculated that a dismissal by the TCC could eliminate certain financial enticements for athletes to play in Canada. This article summarizes the facts and tax issues at stake in this appeal.

In The King v. MMV Capital Partners Inc., the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) found that the general anti-avoidance rule (GAAR), section 245 of the Income Tax Act (Act), applied to a series of loss utilization transactions. According to the FCA, the transactions were structured to allow a third-party purchaser to access the taxpayer’s losses, and the GAAR applied because the transactions frustrated the object, spirit, and purpose of the loss restriction rules in subsection 111(5) of the Act.