Peter Landman discusses the issues with regard to the Crown’s duty to consult when First Nation communities enter into Impact Benefit Agreements (IBA) with proponents.

Jonathan Charland revisits the 2007 Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia case, and argues that interpreting the test for Aboriginal title has been rendered difficult by inconsistencies in the jurisprudence.

As my first term as chair comes to an end, I cannot help but reflect on the past activities of the Aboriginal Law Section, as well as look forward to what we have in store for next term.

On Thursday, June 2, 2011 (there was no hockey game that night), the colleagues, friends and family of Robert A. Boswell gathered in Toronto to honour him as this year’s recipient of the Ron Ellis Award.

New Work Reintegration operational policies took effect on July 15, 2011.

This article will highlight the emerging trends in workplace safety and insurance law by focusing on the current Health Professionals Initial Report (Form 8) and its role as a “tool” for more effective claims management.

I am privileged to be the Chair for the 2010-2011 term of the Real Property Section Executive of the Ontario Bar Association.

Most lawyers appreciate that, in Canada, the Crown and all of its agencies have a duty, when making decisions which may adversely impact lands which are subject to the claims of Aboriginal peoples, to first consult with the potentially affected First Nations, and then to reasonably accommodate...

The case of Lexington on the Green Inc. v. Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 1930, an unreported decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal released on November 9th, 2010...

It is a fait accompli that an assignment of rents could be registered in Land Titles. As the right to get rents is a chose in action, it has to be registered under the P.P.S.A.