Articles

On April 22, 2020 as part of the OBA’s Priority PD program the Constitutional, Civil Liberties and Human Rights law section joined with the Elder Law section to address key issues related to emergency measures for older adults, people with disabilities, and the lawyers who represent them. This article provides an overview of that program.

In UAlberta Pro-Life v. Governors of the University of Alberta, the Alberta Court of Appeal held that a university's regulation of free expression on campus is a form of governmental action subject to Charter scrutiny. The decision sets a new precedent on the application of the Charter to university activities, applies the Doré test on a correctness standard of review, and considers the recent Vavilov decision of the Supreme Court of Canada. This article reviews this noteworthy decision.

Can a corporation challenge a mandatory minimum fine on the basis that it infringes s. 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms? This is the question the Supreme Court of Canada will address in Attorney General of Quebec, et al. v. 9147-0732 Québec Inc., which was argued before the Supreme Court in January 2020 and is currently under reserve.

On November 25, 2019, the CCLHR section and the Young Lawyers’ section held a joint program on appearing before federal administrative tribunals on human rights, employment, and labour issues. The panel featured two adjudicators and two lawyers, who offered information and advice on issues such as the correct forum for litigating disputes, the speed of dispute resolution before the various tribunals, and practice tips for counsel. This article summarizes the program.

A summary of the Charter Conference on October 3, 2019.

A short piece about LAO funding cuts, noting that budgetary policy may be being implemented in a discriminatory way.

A review of a recent HRTO decision, in which an applicant's forum choice resulted in her inability to proceed at both the Tribunal and in court. The decision underscores the importance of understanding the interplay between civil and administrative proceedings, and demonstrates the need to carefully evaluate the powers of administrative tribunals to limit or dismiss proceedings when developing a litigation strategy.

This article explores the desirability of mediation in human rights cases, the appropriate process and the crucial role of the mediator (including non-HRTO complaints).

Recently, the Court of Appeal for Ontario was asked to determine the constitutionality of mid-election changes to the City of Toronto's municipal ward structure (City of Toronto v Ontario (AG), 2019 ONCA 732, rev'g 2018 ONSC 5151). While the election that sparked the litigation has long passed, the Court of Appeal's decision nonetheless offers insight on constitutional issues of fundamental and continuing importance.