Section Articles

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of March 16, 2026.

Toronto’s preparation for the 2026 FIFA World Cup has introduced traffic and mobility measures that include restricting or pausing construction activities along key corridors during the event period, potentially impacting contractual performance and project schedules. Public reporting indicates that construction affecting major routes may be limited between May and July 2026, with some projects being sequenced or temporarily paused to accommodate traffic management and event logistics, creating foreseeable, non-project-specific constraints. In certain cases, active works may be stopped and resumed following the tournament, with associated demobilization and remobilization costs and schedule impacts falling to be addressed under the applicable contract mechanisms.

Ontario’s adjudication regime under the Construction Act was designed to provide rapid, interim resolution of payment disputes in the construction industry. Since the onset of statutory adjudication in 2019, the Divisional Court has been called upon with increasing frequency to delineate the boundaries of judicial oversight of adjudicators’ determinations. Sayers Foods Ltd. v. Gay Company Ltd., 2026 ONSC 918, is not only the latest notable Divisional Court pronouncement on statutory adjudication, but it also addresses matters of general importance beyond the Construction Act: allegations of fraud, delay claims, adjudicator bias and the treatment of evidence on judicial review.

Every lawyer who practices in administrative law has surely heard the warning that the tribunal at which they are about to appear is a “kangaroo court” – a disparaging remark used to describe a tribunal that lacks structure and rules, willing to admit any evidence, far outside the rigours of the civil court system. This article challenges this assumption. Based on the analysis contained herein, Tribunals do not “let everything in” or ignore the rules of evidence without justification.

Generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) is poised to reshape the Canadian legal and regulatory landscape in 2026. As the Canadian government explores the domestic regulation of AI and businesses race to leverage AI technology, Canadians will have to navigate a changing terrain defined by both opportunity and heightened risk. This article highlights five AI trends that deserve particular attention in the year ahead, from the evolving regulatory landscape and growing scrutiny of ownership of AI outputs to questions about authorship, privacy and liability related to the use and misuse of the novel technology.

A powerful reminder for anyone sharing vehicle ownership. Consent from one owner can create liability for all. In Nowakowski v Campbell, 2025 ONCA 762, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld a motion judge’s decision that a co-owner of a motor vehicle can be held liable for loss or damage caused by the negligent operation of the vehicle, even if they did not consent to a non-owner using it, so long as another co-owner did provide that consent.

Recent amendments to the Education Act require school boards to work with local police services to provide access to schools prescribed circumstances. The Ministry of Education has proposed new regulations that detail the circumstances where police must be given access to participate in school board programming and to implement school resource officer programs. This article provides an overview of the Ministry’s proposal.

The Ontario Superior Court’s decision in Re Shaw, 2025 ONSC 6385 clarifies judicial interpretation of “total income” in section 68 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”). While the surplus income regime is a familiar feature of Canadian bankruptcy law, the treatment of loans advanced during bankruptcy has remained surprisingly underdeveloped in jurisprudence. In Re Shaw, the Court addresses this gap by drawing a principled distinction between true loans and income, and underscoring the importance of fairness and the trustee’s advisory role in the bankruptcy process.

Adjudication under the Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30, has become an established mechanism for resolving payment and contract disputes, but recent legislative and regulatory changes have reshaped how it intersects with lien and trust remedies. Practitioners must now navigate a more nuanced landscape, weighing not only the timing and scope of adjudication but also whether it should complement or replace traditional lien proceedings. Decisions about pursuing adjudication, liens, or a combination of both require careful consideration of enforcement options, procedural efficiency, and cost, particularly where multiple invoices or complex disputes arise. This article explores the evolving framework, recent case law, and strategic considerations for practitioners for selecting the most effective pathway to protect client interests and maximize recovery.

To better understand why members of the OBA Child and Youth Law Section do what they do, I sat down with some section executive members to hear what brought them to child and youth law and why they volunteer with the Section.

Contribuer à cette importante ressource nationale avant le 1er mai 2026 ! On cherche de contenus et des suggestions en français ou in English.

Contribute to this important national resource by May 1, 2026! We're looking for content and suggestions in English and en français.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of March 2, 2026.

The year 2025 proved to be a defining one for human rights adjudication in Ontario. Significant judicial review decisions from the Divisional Court, notable findings of sexual harassment and sex-based discrimination, important rulings on pregnancy-related protections, and major procedural reforms have reshaped the landscape for practitioners and self-represented applicants alike. This article examines the key decisions and developments, with an eye toward what they mean for those navigating the system in 2026 and beyond.

The importance of the writ of habeas corpus cannot be overstated; predating the magna carta itself, it has been described by Adam Smith as the “great security against suppression," by William Blackstone as the “great and efficacious writ in all manner of illegal confinement," and by many more as the “Great Writ of Liberty." Habeas corpus requires a public authority detaining a person to bring them before a court to justify the legality of their detention; if the detention is found to be unlawful, the court must order their release. Expanding on the law of habeas corpus, the Supreme Court in Dorsey v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 SCC 38 (“Dorsey”), found that a decision to deny an inmate a lower security classification can trigger the inmate’s habeas corpus rights.

In their letter to the legal profession, the Ontario Association of Chiefs of Police notes that orders under section 36(2) of the Children's Law Reform Act are meant to be “exceptional, time-limited remedies." The Association goes on to say that “police enforcement should be used sparingly.” Moreover, “recurring forced police apprehensions are not in the best interests of the child and should never become a long-term fixture in a child’s life to manage the parents’ behaviour."

From the first day of law school many of us walk in with the same goal in mind: secure an articling position. We study into the night to get good grades, join student clubs and moot competitions, all in the hopes of standing out during interviews. But once you finally land your articling position, a new question arises, how do you actually prepare for the transition from law student to articling student? In this article I share my experience navigating the shift and offer practical advice for both students and supervising lawyers to help make the articling term a successful and meaningful one.

A candid snapshot of a new lawyer’s first days in practice. An honest account of being thrown into the deep end—and discovering that uncertainty is the true starting point of legal practice.

Former pro basketball player and now corporate/commercial lawyer Ryan Ejim shares why he built a “Second Act” practice focused on helping professional athletes transition after retirement. Drawing on his own path from elite university basketball to overseas pro play, injury, and law school, he outlines the legal and structural planning athletes need to protect wealth, avoid predatory deals, and build sustainable careers beyond sport.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of February 17, 2026.

A fundamental shift away from traditional discovery has been brewing in this province via the Ontario Civil Rules Review. The latest proposal, released on December 15, 2025, suggests a transformation of discovery under the Rules of Civil Procedure.

Acceptance Speech of Justin Nasseri, inaugural OBA Civil Litigation Emerging Leader Award winner, with introduction by OBA Civil Litigation Executive Chair, Adil Abdulla

On January 30, 2026, the Federal Court of Appeal released a significant decision in Attorney General of Canada v. Responsible Plastic Use Coalition, 2026 FCA 17, reshaping the national conversation on plastics regulation and validating the federal government’s authority to list Plastic Manufactured Items as “toxic” under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999.

It has been nearly a decade since a province has enacted franchise legislation in Canada, but Saskatchewan is set to change that. Its new The Franchise Disclosure Act, coming into force on June 30, 2026, and its accompanying regulations brings the province into the regulated fold, introducing statutory disclosure requirements for franchisors operating in Saskatchewan. While the regime largely mirrors the models found in other provinces, it introduces several distinctive elements that franchisors need to understand, changes that close a longstanding regulatory gap and create new national compliance considerations that franchisors should begin planning for now.

The Civil Rules Review (“CRR”) was launched in 2024 as a joint initiative of the Chief Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice and the Attorney General. The CRR’s mandate was to propose wholesale reforms to the Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Rules”) so that the civil justice system can be more accessible and to reduce costs and delays. A working group of lawyers, judges and academics was created to identify issues and create proposals (the “Working Group”). Following an earlier Consultation Paper, on December 19, 2025, the Working Group released its final policy report (the “Report”) to the public. Pages 176-183 of the Report relate to pre-trial procedure. In this article, I discuss the current procedure, the Working Group’s proposed reforms from the point of view of employment lawyers, and how these reforms, if implemented, may impact wrongful dismissal litigation in Ontario.

In two recent decisions, the Ontario Land Tribunal confirmed that the individual and fact-specific context of an application factors heavily on the reasonableness of a condition requiring parkland dedication, or cash in lieu (“CIL”). These rulings make clear that parkland dedication is not a generalized revenue tool for municipalities and is not intended to be imposed on every proposal that could be classified as development or redevelopment.

In this Q&A, Business Law Section Chair Avram Musafija talks about the challenges and most fulfilling aspects of his work, offers his best advice and lessons learned, and shares what excites him most about a busy year for the Section Executive. 

As of January 26, 2026, trial dates at the Ontario Court of Justice in Toronto can no longer be scheduled by email. There are now three methods to set dates at OCJ-T: 1) at a Virtual Counter via Zoom (no appointment needed). 2) at the physical counter located at 10 Armoury Street (no appointment needed), and 3) via appointment through a Trial Scheduling Meeting.

This article provides a refresher on the constructive dismissal doctrine and explores developments on permissible return-to-office measures.

The treatment of employee bonuses can be complicated, but reading this article will helpfully shed light on important considerations to comply with statutory requirements.

A brief profile of Mel Anderson, SAGDA's outgoing Chair for 2024-2025.

The concept of a “substitute decision-maker” is deceptively simple but legally complex. While the role is often conflated with informal caregiving or family decision-making, in law it carries significant fiduciary duties and procedural consequences. Matters are further complicated by inconsistent terminology: the Substitute Decisions Act, the Family Law Rules, and the Rules of Civil Procedure each frame incapacity and representation in slightly different ways. For practitioners, this patchwork can create pitfalls when advising clients, drafting materials, or litigating issues involving incapable parties.

In Decision No. 774/25, the WSIAT denied entitlement after finding that a worker’s injury, sustained during an unpaid lunch break on public property near the workplace, did not occur in the course of employment. The decision highlights that location, timing, and the personal nature of a worker’s activities remain key considerations when assessing entitlement for injuries occurring off employer premises.

In Decision No. 469/25, the WSIAT granted entitlement for chronic mental stress after finding that extraordinary workplace conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic exposed the worker to objectively dangerous health and safety risks. The decision highlights that “normal job stress” must be assessed contextually, and that exposure to heightened workplace hazards may constitute a substantial work related stressor for CMS entitlement purposes.

This article provides a summary of which documents can be executed remotely and best practices to ensure lawyers are complying with the legislation governing digital signatures.

This article provides guidance and resources to assist lawyers with clients who have assets in Québec, and describes new online services for searching for Wills in Québec.

This article outlines the developments in regulating and legislating MAID, including updates from Québec, British Columbia, and a discussion of mental illness in MAID.

The year 2025 will likely be remembered as a defining moment for international law. Across regions and legal regimes, we witnessed a convergence of forces that placed extraordinary strain on the rule-based international order. What made 2025 particularly challenging was not only the scale of these developments but also the environment in which they unfolded: legal determinations were increasingly filtered through political narratives, binding obligations were treated as optional, and evidence-based findings by courts and UN bodies were often dismissed as partisan or inconvenient. In such a climate, international law demands disciplined attention to facts rather than emotion, law rather than politics, and accountability rather than image management. This article outlines several of the most significant international legal developments of 2025 and reflects on what they collectively reveal about the state and stakes of international law today.

What is a class action? Why do we have them? How much do lawyers and litigation funders benefit from them, and why? This article, originally published by Lexpert, gets into the nitty gritty of these questions, through the lens of how different Canadian jurisdictions approach the issues of litigation funding, adverse costs, and counsel remuneration.

In a trilogy of cases in 2022, the Ontario Court of Appeal sharply limited the availability of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion in privacy and data breach class actions involving third-party hackers. This article considers two recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decisions which demonstrate that while the Trilogy narrowed the scope of privacy class actions in Ontario, it did not necessarily close the door.

In Gifford v. Air Canada, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice denied certification of a proposed class proceeding which alleged a supply-suppression conspiracy among several airlines. This article highlights key takeaways concerning certification motions in proposed competition class actions, including the importance of taking into account the dynamics of the Canadian market and the economic complexities associated with an allegedly cartelized product.

The responsibilities assumed by a representative plaintiff are significant and can give rise to pressure, financial risk and public scrutiny. There has been much judicial debate over the question of whether a representative plaintiff should receive some monetary amount in recognition of taking on the role. This article summarizes the Canadian courts' treatment of the issue and considers some recent and notable trends coming out of the Ontario courts.

Exposure to PFAS in drinking water has been associated with health risks such as immune suppression, thyroid disruption, and an increased risk of certain cancers. As a result, there has been a significant rise in class actions alleging property value diminution due to the stigma of PFAS-contaminated drinking water. Real estate professionals should be aware of this emerging issue.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal's recent decision in Gitxaala v British Columbia (Chief Gold Commissioner) ("Gitxaala") dramatically increases the ability of Indigenous rights and title holders to use the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People ("UNDRIP") to advance and protect their interests. This article summarizes the decision and highlights two ways we have begun using this decision in our advocacy in British Columbia and across the country: 1) UNDRIP may expand the Duty to Consult and Accommodate ("DTCA"); and 2) UNDRIP may be enforceable in the courts where the Crown is not delivering on its promise to recognize and implement UNDRIP rights.

This article discusses how AI’s ability to replicate voices, images, and other personal traits is prompting new legal questions about the protection of personality rights.

This article examines how artificial intelligence has transformed various sectors, particularly the fashion and creative industries. While AI offers significant efficiencies, it also poses a growing threat to originality, evolving into a crisis of trademark distinctiveness with direct implications for Canadian and global IP law.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario from January 19, 2026 to January 23, 2026.

In this article, Benjamin Miller addresses two common questions he gets (typically from sports organizations or festivals) about whether sponsorships or in-kind contributions make an organization a public benefit corporation (PBC) under Ontario's Not-for-Profit Corporations Act (ONCA).

DEML Investments Limited v. Canada is a GAAR decision where the FCA found that a bump transaction involving Canadian resource properties abused paragraph 88(1)(d). The FCA applied the GAAR to deny only the portion of the capital loss that is attributable to the ACB bump, thereby revising the TCC decision in part.

In this article, Shannon Sweeney examines the practical and cost consequences arising from Ontario’s October 1, 2025 increase of the Small Claims Court monetary limit to $50,000. She explains how litigants who commenced actions under the Superior Court’s Simplified Procedure may now face difficult strategic decisions, particularly where significant procedural steps have already been completed. While the Superior Court retains discretion to award costs in cases that fall within Small Claims jurisdiction, Sweeney notes that such discretion is exercised sparingly and only in exceptional circumstances. Ultimately, the article underscores that remaining in Simplified Procedure may be reasonable in limited contexts, but meaningful cost recovery is unlikely once damages fall within Small Claims limits.

Does the common law allow for the defence of “consensual fight” to excuse domestic assaults? This question has concerned defence counsel contemplating potential defences to their clients’ assault charges, Crown counsel trying to prove the accused guilty of the alleged unlawful conduct, as well as trial and appellate judges considering specific policy reasons for vitiating consent in an intimate partner violence context...

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario from January 12, 2026 to January 16, 2026.

Subsection 247(2.1) establishes that transfer pricing rules take precedence over other tax provisions when determining transactions for Canadian corporations with related non-residents. This subsection outlines three ordering rules, introduced in Budget 2019 and legislated under Bill C-30 – these rules can be pertinent to Canadian technology firms participating in Scientific Research and Experimental Development (“SR&ED”) initiatives, particularly when a related non-resident company is involved. This article addresses potential uncertainties associated with applying these ordering rules when calculating ITCs – and subsequent sale/disposition of a developed asset via SR&ED activities.

Tax disputes follow many stages and phases. Each phase of a tax dispute from CRA audit and appeals to appealing to the Tax Court of Canada includes different practical and qualitative considerations for taxpayers. Where a taxpayer disagrees with positions and processes while at the CRA audit and appeals steps, the Tax Court of Canada offers an important check on the application of tax law. In addition to more robust rules and procedures at the Tax Court of Canada, judicial oversight can help ensure a fairer process for taxpayers when compared to the Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Adding the perspective of Department of Justice lawyers when appealing to the Tax Court of Canada can also facilitate settlement by providing a new risk assessment for the Minister.

In its 2025 Federal Budget, the Department of Finance Canada proposed certain amendments to the Income Tax Act (Canada) that are intended to simplify the qualified investment regime for registered plans. This article provides a short overview and discussion of the proposed changes.

Astle v. The King, 2025 TCC 105 (Informal Procedure), is a recent decision from the Tax Court of Canada taking up a former company director’s liability for unremitted payroll source deductions. The Tax Court dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal, finding that the taxpayer had been validly assessed by the Canada Revenue Agency within two years after the taxpayer had last ceased to be a director of the corporation. The Tax Court also concluded that the taxpayer had not established due diligence to prevent the failure to remit. While the Tax Court’s decision in this case may be understandable on its facts, the Court has continued to adopt statements from prior authorities that, respectfully, extend the reach of tax legislation beyond an appropriate construction of its text, particularly in light of the need to resort to provincial corporate law to determine when a director has resigned. That provincial authority can, and should, determine when a director has validly resigned in accordance with the prevailing body of corporate law.

When it comes to protecting intellectual property in franchising, trademarks tend to dominate the conversation, largely because the franchise system’s name and logo are often the key drivers of brand recognition and success. However, one of the assets in franchised businesses that is often overlooked are copyrighted materials.

This article explores the key aspects of a common employer finding and outlines the potential pitfalls and mitigation strategies for franchisors seeking to evaluate their own internal practices and protect their business. Ultimately, there are ways to avoid a finding of common employer status, but doing so typically requires franchisors to forego at least some level of operational control. This is not an easy decision, as franchisors must balance the need to control certain employment practices to maintain brand consistency against the risk of being deemed a common employer.  This is a highly individualized balancing act and should be assessed within the context of each franchisor’s unique model.

Ontario has implemented significant amendments to the Construction Act and its regulations effective January 1, 2026, aimed at accelerating cash flow, clarifying rights, and refining adjudication and trust mechanisms across the construction pyramid. This article condenses the principal changes and their practical consequences for construction practitioners in Ontario.

The Canadian Construction Documents Committee (CCDC) recently issued updates to four of its standard form contracts. This article focuses on changes to the following three contracts:

• CCDC 5A – Construction Management Contract – For Services;
• CCDC 5B – Construction Management Contract for Services and Construction; and
• CCDC 17 – Stipulated Price Contract Between Owner and Trade Contractor for Construction Management Projects (collectively, the “2025 CM Contracts”).

On June 16, 2025, new Rule 49.14 of the Rules of Civil Procedure came into force. The rule codifies a line of case law which imposed significant consequences on parties who failed to disclose partial settlements. This article reviews the requirements of the new rule and provides practical guidance for practitioners navigating the transition.

Picture this – you are subcontractor who has been contracted to build, weld, and otherwise complete the structural steel component of a commercial building. Your team finishes the welding – only to realize afterward that none of the workers were certified by the Canadian Welding Bureau (“CWB”), nor were they supervised by someone who was. You submit your invoice to the general contractor or the owner, but payment is refused due to "deficiencies." Can you still enforce your right to payment? According to the common law in Ontario, the short answer is unlikely.

On April 17, 2025, Earth Boring Co. Limited (EBCL) sought protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (the CCAA). Among the provisions of the court’s initial order was a temporary stay preventing claims being made on certain performance bonds. This temporary stay led some in the construction industry to question the value of performance bonds during an insolvency. The outcome of the EBCL case, however, demonstrates the objectives of the CCAA process can be achieved without prejudicing the rights of project owners who want to ensure that their bonded contracts are completed.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario from December 31, 2025 to January 9, 2026

In this personal reflection, Dr. Ningjing (Natalie) Zhang shares a New Year’s resolution that reshaped how she practices law, leads her firm, and lives her life: learning to be her own best friend. Drawing from her experiences as a refugee-turned-lawyer, single mother, and first-time law firm owner, she reflects on how relentless self-criticism, though often mistaken for discipline, can quietly erode resilience. Through moments of parenting challenges, professional mistakes, and emotional reckoning, she argues that self-compassion is not indulgence but essential maintenance—especially for women lawyers navigating demanding careers.

Starting a law firm in Ontario is both challenging and rewarding, requiring lawyers to make numerous strategic and operational decisions. New practitioners may choose from various business models, including fully independent practices, agency arrangements, or freelance rosters. Establishing a successful firm demands a solid business plan, careful budgeting for start-up costs, and access to essential resources such as practice management software and professional insurance. Lawyers must also meet Law Society of Ontario compliance requirements, including a mandatory practice essentials course beginning in 2025. As client development skills are rarely taught in law school, networking and marketing are critical. The Ontario Bar Association’s Solo and Small Firm Section consolidates key guidance, practical tools, and wellness resources into a single, accessible reference.

From Risk to Resilience: Cybersecurity for Legal Practices provides a practical and comprehensive cybersecurity framework for solo practitioners and small law firms. It explains why legal practices are prime targets for cybercrime and outlines common and emerging threats, including phishing, ransomware, business email compromise, and AI-enabled attacks. The report emphasizes compliance with Law Society of Ontario obligations and PIPEDA, highlights high-risk practice areas, and sets out actionable daily security measures. It includes a clear incident response plan for the first 60 minutes following a breach and offers guidance on engaging cybersecurity professionals and selecting cyber insurance. Overall, the report frames cybersecurity as an essential component of competent, ethical, and resilient legal practice.

Kathleen Robichaud emphasizes that email is a powerful but imperfect communication tool for lawyers and should be used thoughtfully and professionally. She highlights the importance of deciding whether a reply is necessary, replying only to appropriate recipients, and avoiding accidental disclosures through careless use of “Reply All” or auto-fill. Lawyers should read emails in full, keep message chains concise, and use clear, updated subject lines. Tone and formality matter, as email remains a formal communication in legal practice. Robichaud also cautions that email is insecure and unreliable, making it unsuitable for sensitive information, and stresses the value of organizing email effectively to enhance efficiency and communication quality.

Are you a 3L and still have not lined up your articling position? You are not alone. Finding an articling position takes creativity, perseverance, and planning ahead. Many in-house organizations and small firms often don’t know a year in advance whether they need an articling student, so they may not participate in the formal recruitment. Job postings by career development offices may not always list all of the available positions. This article shares tips and personal anecdotes from Hanaa Ameer-Uddin, articling student at Mercedes-Benz Financial Services Canada.

Since the last amendments to the Divorce Act came into effect in March 2021, family law in Canada has continued to evolve in response to family violence. Those amendments expanded the definition of family violence, addressed its impact on children, and updated relocation provisions, including the ability to waive notice in cases of violence. Nearly five years later, Bill C-223 (Keeping Children Safe Act) builds on these reforms by strengthening protections for children and survivors, emphasizing risk assessment, child‑focused decision‑making, and a trauma‑informed approach in family law proceedings.

For decades, the global response to environmental destruction has been a complex web of regulatory frameworks. These systems, detailed and often technocratic, have primarily operated on a principle of licensing harm and penalizing infractions with fines. But what happens when those fines are simply absorbed as a “cost of doing business”? The result is a system that has, by and large, failed to stem the tide of widespread, long-term environmental damage.

The Bora Laskin Faculty of Law marked a truly historic moment on November 17 and 18, 2025, as it welcomed the Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) to campus as part of the Court’s 150th anniversary celebrations. The visit, which concluded the SCC’s national anniversary tour in Thunder Bay, Ontario, was both a celebration of Canada’s highest court and an unforgettable experience for students, faculty, and staff.

The modern legal client increasingly comes armed with their own AI-generated research, presenting novel challenges for lawyers. Debating a ‘machine’ that produces opinions with authority and rapidity but without legal skill or judgement, can not only cost lawyers time and erode trust, but create liability exposure. Allan Ritchie offers advice for responding with restraint to AI-fueled ‘findings’ while redirecting the conversation to the real-world decisions the client needs to make.

Recent updates in Ontario and Federal pension legislation, regulatory policy, taxation and caselaw, including overcontributions, automatic OAS enrollment, climate-related financial risks, and more.

When lawyers reference Aldous Huxley's Brave New World, they often treat "soma" as a literary symbol: a metaphor for the numbing effect of mindless entertainment. But soma is not just a metaphor; it is a product specification. It is a set of functional requirements: rapid, predictable relief from distress; minimal downside; and a secondary effect that is central, not incidental, which is social pacification. As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes capable of optimizing human experience with greater precision, soma stops being a philosophy seminar and becomes a governance problem. Crucially, that governance problem is not limited to the digital. A superhuman scientific capability could plausibly contribute to a literal, pharmacological soma through generative chemistry and inverse molecular design (a subject that raises its own governance challenges at the intersection of IP, bioethics, and regulatory law). But the first widely deployed soma analogues will almost certainly arrive through recommendation systems, immersive media, and bewitching AI companions. That is where entertainment lawyers need to focus.

In 2019, the federal government amended the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46 to incorporate the principle of restraint into bail hearings. As stated in section 493.2 of the Criminal Code, a peace officer, justice or judge that is considering release shall give particular attention to the circumstances of (a) Aboriginal accused, and (b) accused who belong to a vulnerable population that is overrepresented in the criminal justice system and that is disadvantaged in obtaining release. Section 493.2 is remedial in nature, and is intended to “ameliorate the pre-trial over incarceration of overrepresented, vulnerable groups," “release more of the accused described in the provision,” and “remedy the problem of overuse of pre-trial custody as well as the overrepresentation of certain populations in the criminal justice system."

Impaired driving and dangerous driving are both illegal and equally serious criminal offences. They are technically rather different when it comes to the Crown proving their elements in court and for counsel defending the accused. Notably, consumption of alcohol, short of the point of impairment, is not the element of the offence of dangerous operation. However, it is “a relevant factor for the trier of fact in considering the mens rea element of the offence of dangerous driving:" R. v. McLennan, 2016 ONCA 732, at para. 27.

The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld an auto-insurer’s denial of coverage to a mother-daughter duo who turned a motor vehicle accident into a case of civil fraud. The Court in Wong v Aviva insurance Company of Canada, 2024 ONCA 874 upheld the lower court’s analysis of Hryniak v Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7, to determine that lying to your insurer about the driver of the vehicle involved in an accident can constitute civil fraud.

In September 2025, the music industry headlines were dominated not by a pop star or a rock band, but by Xania Monet, a virtual R&B artist created using the AI platform Suno. Reports from Billboard and Forbes confirmed that the human creator behind the project, Telisha “Nikki” Jones, signed a record deal with Hallwood Media worth up to $3 million. For entertainment lawyers, the headline is flashy, but the legal reality is a headache. If a human creator contributes lyrics and prompts, but an AI generates the melody, harmony, and vocal performance, what “economic rights” actually exist to support a multi-million dollar transaction?

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of December 8, 2025.

Following are our summaries of the civil decisions of the Court of Appeal for Ontario for the week of December 1, 2025.

I have been thinking about domestic violence and asking myself this question:  As a society, are we making any progress in dealing with this plague?

With revisions to Ontario's Rules of Civil Procedure on the horizon, read about the continued value in considering alternatives such as mediation and arbitration.

Hanaa Ameer-Uddin graduated from the University of Ottawa and now articles at Mercedes-Benz Financial Services. Her interest in corporate law traces back to growing up in a family of entrepreneurs; from a young age, she noticed the impact of business decisions on people’s lives. In this conversation, she walks us through her path from undergrad to articling and shares practical advice for law students finding their way.

Parental leave is often described as time away from one’s career, but for many lawyers, it becomes an unexpected chapter of growth, clarity, and transformation. In this candid reflection, Jessica Byles-Nolet shares how stepping back from practice during her first year of motherhood reshaped her understanding of identity, ambition, and balance. What began as a fear of losing her professional edge evolved into a profound realization: that legal skills can be strengthened outside the office, and that presence—both at home and at work—requires intention. Her story offers encouragement to lawyers navigating parental leave and redefining what it means to thrive.

This summary of the Divisional Court's recent decision in R v Bortolon, 2025 ONSC 3848, discusses key takeaways for health lawyers whose practices include professional regulation matters.

In this deeply personal reflection, Dr. Ningjing (Natalie) Zhang revisits her journey from living in a women’s shelter to becoming an immigration and refugee lawyer in Ontario. Inspired by a recent GROWL gathering, she shares three lessons she wishes she could give her younger self — lessons shaped by hardship, resilience, mentorship, and growth. This article invites lawyers, especially those from marginalized backgrounds, to rethink belonging, reject comparison, and embrace their unique stories as sources of strength.

Ontario’s immigration system is entering a period of major change. Over the past year, the OINP has expanded its enforcement powers, increased its discretion to return or cancel applications, and introduced new interview and inspection authorities through recent regulatory amendments and Bill 30. These developments have already resulted in the suspension and return of entire categories of applications, including the Skilled Trades Stream, largely due to systemic compliance concerns. At the same time, unresolved issues such as the treatment of restricted CPSO licences continue to limit eligibility for self-employed physicians despite critical labour needs. While the province is working to address some of these gaps, the overall system now faces heightened uncertainty. As Ontario moves into 2026, restoring transparency, predictability, and procedural fairness will be essential to maintaining a functional and trustworthy OINP for employers, applicants, and communities.

Read about strategic considerations that all litigators should have in mind with the upcoming changes to Ontario's Rules of Civil Procedure.