CBA memberships expired on August 31, 2025. Renew today to continue enjoying your benefits.

The Ontario Court of Appeal Provides Important Guidance on Evidence Involving Novel Science, Collateral Facts, and Statutory Benefits

June 4, 2024 | Thomas Russell, Stieber Berlach

Background

In March of 2012, Shoba Kolapully was struck by a Toronto Transit Commission (“TTC”) bus, driven by Lynda Myles.[1] Kolapully commenced an action against Myles and the TTC for general and specific damages in 2013, claiming serious and permanent physical and psychological impairment.[2]

In 2022, a six-week trial took place, where a jury allocated 25% contributory negligence against Kolapully and 75% as against  the TTC and Myles.[3] The jury awarded Kolapully non-pecuniary damages and damages for past loss income loss. Importantly, Kolapully had received non-earner benefits under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule in a prior proceeding before the Licence Appeal Tribunal.[4] The trial judge determined that these benefits would not be deducted from the damages for past income loss. [5]

The Appeal

The TTC appealed, arguing that the trial judge erred in five ways:[6]

  1. Improperly allowing into evidence an untried medical test, the Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (“SPECT”) scan of Kolapully;
  2. Improperly excluding evidence of attendant care claims forms Kolapully signed in blank as part of alleged participation in a fraudulent scheme;  
  3. Improperly articulating the test for causation in their jury instructions and instructions on the calculation of damages;
  4. Refusing to deduct non-earner benefits from the tort award; and
  5. Erring in the determination of the costs award.

Please login to access this article.

Login to MyCBA