Articles

About Articles The below articles are published by the Construction and Infrastructure Law Section of the Ontario Bar Association. Members are encouraged to submit articles. About Articles

Editors: Lia Bruschetta and James Singleton

Today
Today
<em>Jade-Kennedy Development Corporation (Re), 2016</em> ONSC 7125

Jade-Kennedy Development Corporation (Re), 2016 ONSC 7125

  • February 28, 2017
  • Justin Zuccon

Priority disputes can get messy, especially where there are more than one borrower and mortgagee involved; over a dozen lien claimants asserting their priorities; and multiple advances to different parties in different amounts made at different times under different mortgages and credit facilities.

Construction and Infrastructure Law
Don’t Scoff at the s.12 Set-Off – Retain Payment from the Multi-Project Claimant

Don’t Scoff at the s.12 Set-Off – Retain Payment from the Multi-Project Claimant

  • January 26, 2017
  • Alexander Wilkes

In instances where a party hires a contractor to conduct work on multiple, unrelated projects, the contractor may be owed an undisputed amount on one project, yet the payer may wish to retain this undisputed amount until such time as disputed amounts on a second, unrelated project are addressed.

Construction and Infrastructure Law
<em>Trenchline Const. Inc. v. Unimac-United Mgmt. Corp.,</em>2016 ONSC 6136

Trenchline Const. Inc. v. Unimac-United Mgmt. Corp.,2016 ONSC 6136

  • December 02, 2016
  • Justin Zuccon

In Trenchline Construction Inc. v. Unimac-United Management Corp., 2016 ONSC 6136, Master Wiebe provided a clarification of the substantive requirements for a written notice of lien under section 24 of the Construction Lien Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30.

Construction and Infrastructure Law
<em>Proxema Ltd., v. Birock Investments Inc., et al.,</em> 2016 ONSC 5686

Proxema Ltd., v. Birock Investments Inc., et al., 2016 ONSC 5686

  • December 02, 2016
  • Justin Zuccon

In Proxema Ltd. the defendant, York Medical Group moved simultaneously for leave under section 67(2) of the Construction Lien Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30 to bring an interlocutory step and security for costs against the plaintiff, Proxema Ltd. (“Proxema”) under Rule 56.01 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, R.R.O.1990 Reg. 194.

Case Comment: <em>Dean’s Standard Inc. v Siljub Toronto Ltd., 2016 ONSC 5254</em>

Case Comment: Dean’s Standard Inc. v Siljub Toronto Ltd., 2016 ONSC 5254

  • September 23, 2016
  • Justin Zuccon

Dean’s Standard Inc. painfully illustrates why construction contractors must proceed with caution when entering into agreements to supply labour or materials at the behest of a potential purchaser of a property where the actual owners of the property are not present throughout the contractual discussions.

Construction and Infrastructure Law
2016 OBA Award of Excellence in Construction & Infrastructure Law Dinner and Site Visit

2016 OBA Award of Excellence in Construction & Infrastructure Law Dinner and Site Visit

  • September 23, 2016
  • Max Gennis

On June 9, 2016, members of the Construction & Infrastructure Law Section assembled at the Albany Club of Toronto to celebrate the beginning of summer, get an up-close look at the E&Y Tower construction project at 100 Adelaide Street West, and toast the accomplishments of Geza R. Banfai as he was awarded this year’s OBA Award of Excellence in Construction & Infrastructure Law.

Construction and Infrastructure Law
Interim Progress Report: Review of Tarion and Associated Legislation

Interim Progress Report: Review of Tarion and Associated Legislation

  • September 23, 2016
  • Richard Wong

In November of 2015, the Honourable J. Douglas Cunningham was appointed by the Ontario Minister of Government and Consumer Services as a special advisor to conduct an independent review of the Ontario New Home Warranties Plan Act and the Tarion Warranty Corporation, with a general focus on reviewing the existing protections for owners of new homes and experiences to date and identifying opportunities to improve consumer protection.

Construction and Infrastructure Law
The Duty of Good Faith Turns Two

The Duty of Good Faith Turns Two

  • September 23, 2016
  • Yonni Fushman

It has been almost two years since the Supreme Court of Canada recognized “a new common law duty that applies to all contracts as a manifestation of the general organizing principle of good faith: a duty of honest performance” in the landmark Bhasin v. Hyrnewdecision. As Bhasin enters its toddler years, how has the duty of good faith evolved?

Construction and Infrastructure Law
The Vexatious Litigant in Construction Law

The Vexatious Litigant in Construction Law

  • May 31, 2016
  • David Debenham

David Debenham shares his view on how a particular class of self-represented litigants are damaging the legal system.

Construction and Infrastructure Law